Author(s): 1.Edwar Alvarez MD,2 Romaisa Shamim Khan,3 David Alvarez MD,4 Andrea Iñiguez MD,5 Muhammad Daiem
Received: 22/07/2020 | Published: 25/09/2020 | Pages: 64-68 |
Background: Adequate reconstruction of the soft palate to achieve quality of phonation is one of the main objectives of cleft palate repair. Even with adequate repair, the soft palate may remain short, leading to Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. In such cases lengthening is achieved by sacrificing other important anatomical structures. Objective: We present a new technique in the reconstruction of the soft palate that elongates it in an efficient way providing adequate sufficiency and uvular competence, without sacrificing other palatal structures. Methods: During a five-year period, this technique was applied to a total of 731 patients, 437 in primary repairs and 294 in secondary or revision cases. All patients were subjected to a quantitative analysis with the “Alvarez Scale” or Speech Score both before and after surgery. Results: There was a notable improvement in our series in the prevention and treatment of Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). There was a gain of one to two points (over fifteen) in improvement as compared to what the revision group had in their preoperative evaluation. Conclusion: In our experience, the Third Generation Veloplasty (TGV) is more effective in improving the velopharyngeal function than the first generation Veloplasty (OR = 2.76) Keywords | Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), First Generation Veloplasty (FGV), Second Generation Veloplasty (SGV), Third Generation Veloplasty (TGV), Uvular insufficiency (UI), Uvular incompetence (UIc), Speech Score (SS)
1. Murray J. Report of a Clinical Standard Advisory Committee (CSAG) on Cleft Lip and/or Palate (United Kingdom). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Officer. 1998.
2. Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-Mcdade C, Brattström V, Mars M, Mcwilliam J, Mølsted K, Plint DA, Prahl- Andersen B, Roberts C, Semb G. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 1992 Sep;29(5):413-8.
3. Perko M. The history of treatment of cleft lip and palate. InHistorical Aspects of Pediatric Surgery 1986 (pp. 238-251). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
4. Larossa D. The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2000 May; 37(3): 225-8.
5. Strong EB, Buckmiller LM. Management of the cleft palate. Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America. 2001 Feb 1;9(1):15-25.
6. Van Lierde KM, Monstrey S, Bonte K, Van Cauwenberge P, Vinck B. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2004 Jul 1;68(7):865-75.
7. Bae YC, Kim JH, Lee J, Hwang SM, Kim SS. Comparative study of the extent of palatal lengthening by different methods. Annals of plastic surgery. 2002 Apr 1;48(4):359 64.
8. Agrawal K. Cleft palate repair and variations. Indian journal of plastic surgery: official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2009 Oct; 42(Suppl):S102.
9. Noordhoff MS, Kuo J, Cheng WS. Results of the Widmaier-Perko palatoplasty in clefts of secondary palate. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 1983 Apr;12(2 Suppl):359.
10. Leenstra TS, Kohama GI, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Freihofer HP. Supraperiosteal flap technique versus mucoperiosteal flap technique in cleft palate surgery. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 1996 Nov; 33(6): 501-6.
11. Andrades P, Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, Shell IV DH, Thurston TE, Fowler JS, Xavier ST, Ray PD, Grant III JH. The importance of radical intravelar veloplasty during two-flap palatoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2008 Oct 1;122(4):1121-30.
All published material becomes the sole property of the Pakistan Journal of Plastic Surgery, copyrighted by the Pakistan Association of Plastic Surgeons (PAPS). By submitting an article or brief communication, all authors agree to these conditions.
During the submission process, all authors have required to complete a copyright transfer agreement, “Author Consent form” By completing the copyright transfer agreement, you are transferring copyright of figures, tables, videos, and the content of the manuscript to the Pakistan Association of Plastic Surgeons (PAPS).
If you do not wish to or cannot transfer copyright of some or all of your content, please contact the editorial office at pjpspakistan@gmail.com