Author(s): Hafiz Khalil Ahmad1, Bilal Umar2 ,Kamran Khalid3,Muhammad Amin Yousaf4 ,Usman Ishaque5,Ammara Rabbani6
Pages: 16-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/pjps.1713351214
Background: Throughout the years, a plethora of aesthetic rhinoplasty scales and instruments have surfaced,
each tailored to capture distinct dimensions of nasal features, patient contentment, and overall quality of life.
The importance of standardized outcome assessment tools in the context of aesthetic rhinoplasty is
paramount.
Objective: To propose a standardized outcome measuring tool in form of JRAS (Jinnah Burn and
Reconstructive Surgery Centre, Rhinoplasty Assessment Score) that unites patient’s aesthetic preferences
with the surgeon’s clinical objectivity.
Methodology: The study was conducted from March 2023 to August 2023 and 50 participants were enrolled.
All surgeries were performed by different well-known surgeons having experience of more than 10 years in
the field. An independent rhinoplasty surgeon not performing the surgery, assessed the preoperative and
postoperative photographs taken at six months after rhinoplasty and marked the scores according to the
proforma given.ALikert item was generated to link satisfaction scores to a scale.
Results:Whilemean pre-operative JRAS was 41 ±3.2 while postoperative JRAS score was 46.1 ±1.8. This
showed an overall substantial improvement from the preoperative scores. Spearman’s correlation with
satisfaction scores showed a significant positive correlation.
Conclusion: JRAS is a good addition to the already existing repertoire of rhinoplasty assessment scores
especially because it provides unique perspective in linking the plastic surgeon’s assessment in a single
numerical score with the patient’s satisfaction. This allows all data points to be presented in a concise manner.
Received | 20-05-2024 Revision | 29-07-2024 Accepted | 12-08-2024
CorrespondingAuthor | Hafiz KhalilAhmad, Department of Plastic Surgery, Jinnah Hospital Lahore.
Email: khalilah007@gmail.com
Keywords | Aesthetic rhinoplasty, Outcome assessment scale, Surgeon: assessor: patient’s perspective, saddle deformity, hump
deformity.
- Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;12(5):291-7. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2010.62. PMID: 20855769.
- Waite PD. Avoiding revision rhinoplasty. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Feb;23(1):93-100, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Dec 3. PMID: 21126884.
- Thomson C, Mendelsohn M. Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol. 2007 Apr;36(2):130-4. doi: 10.2310/7070.2007.0012. PMID: 17459286.
- Mahmoudi S, Rabbani Zadeh M. Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study. World J Plast Surg. 2022 Jul;11(2):68-74. doi: 10.52547/wjps.11.2.68. PMID: 36117897; PMCID: PMC9446128.
- Alan MA, Kahraman ME, Yüksel F, Yücel A. Comparison of Dorsal Preservation and Dorsal Reduction Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Nasal Patency and Aesthetic Outcomes by Rhinomanometry, NOSE and SCHNOS Scales. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):728-734. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03151-8. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PMID: 36302983.
- Bulut OC, Plinkert PK, Wallner F, Baumann I. Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2569-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3920-x. Epub 2016 Feb 10. PMID: 26864439.
- Daniel RK, Brenner KA. Saddle nose deformity: A new classification and treatment. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Nov;14(4):301-12, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2006.06.008. PMID: 17088179.
- Sharp HR, Rowe-Jones JM. Assessing outcome in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Oct;28(5):430-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00739.x. PMID: 12969346.
- Brito ÍM, Avashia Y, Rohrich RJ. Evidence-based Nasal Analysis for Rhinoplasty: The 10-7-5 Method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Feb 26;8(2):e2632. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002632. PMID: 32309081; PMCID: PMC7159929.
- Jang YJ, Moon H. Special Consideration in the Management of Hump Noses in Asians. Facial Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;36(5):554-562. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717144. Epub 2020 Dec 24. PMID: 33368079.
- Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ. Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Mar;134(3):311-5. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2007.46. PMID: 18347259.
- Rohrich RJ, Malafa MM, Ahmad J, Basci DS. Managing Alar Flare in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5):910-919. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003786. PMID: 29068925.
- Steiger JD, Baker SR. Nuances of profile management: the radix. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;17(1):15-28, v. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2008.09.007. PMID: 19181278.
- Şeneldir S, Dizdar D, Tuna A. Radix saw: a useful tool for rhinoplasty to correct high radix. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;87(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Aug 7. PMID: 31542337; PMCID: PMC9422727.
- Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jan;111(1):469-80; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000036041.67101.48. PMID: 12496620.
- Meyer L, Jacobsson S. The predictive validity of psychosocial factors for patients’ acceptance of rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1986 Dec;17(6):513-20. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198612000-00013. PMID: 3827121.
- Dziewulski P, Dujon D, Spyriounis P, Griffiths RW, Shaw JD. A retrospective analysis of the results of 218 consecutive rhinoplasties. Br J Plast Surg. 1995 Oct;48(7):451-4. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90119-1. PMID: 7551522.
- Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Mar-Apr;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02275535. PMID: 8801805.
- Kotzampasakis D, Piniara A, Themelis S, Kotzampasakis S, Gabriel E, Maroudias N, Nikolopoulos T. Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):2017-2025. doi: 10.1002/lary.26517. Epub 2017 Feb 22. PMID: 28224628.
- Saito T, Tsuzuki K, Nishikawa H, Okazaki K, Hashimoto K, Sakagami M. Nasal Symptom Questionnaire: Our Proposed Scoring System and Prognostic Factors in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2018;80(5-6):296-306. doi: 10.1159/000492965. Epub 2018 Oct 11. PMID: 30308497.
- Slator R. Rhinoplasty patients revisited. Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Jun;46(4):327-31. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(93)90014-3. PMID: 8330091
- Luce EA. Outcome studies and practice guidelines in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Sep;104(4):1187-90. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199909040-00051. PMID: 10654764.
- AlHarethy S, Al-Angari SS, Syouri F, Islam T, Jang YJ. Assessment of satisfaction based on age and gender in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;274(7):2809-2812. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4566-z. Epub 2017 Apr 17. PMID: 28417237.
- Pereira IN, Chattopadhyay R, Fitzpatrick S, Nguyen S, Hassan H. Evidence-based review: Screening body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic clinical settings. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Jul;22(7):1951-1966. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15685. Epub 2023 Feb 27. PMID: 36847707.
All published material becomes the sole property of the Pakistan Journal of Plastic Surgery, copyrighted by the Pakistan Association of Plastic Surgeons (PAPS). By submitting an article or brief communication, all authors agree to these conditions.
During the submission process, all authors have required to complete a copyright transfer agreement, “Author Consent form” By completing the copyright transfer agreement, you are transferring copyright of figures, tables, videos, and the content of the manuscript to the Pakistan Association of Plastic Surgeons (PAPS).
If you do not wish to or cannot transfer copyright of some or all of your content, please contact the editorial office at pjpspakistan@gmail.com.